<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Threadless Deals With Plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php</link>
	<description>You know, for t-shirts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendan</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>I bet the stencil is also infringing on some obscure copyright holder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet the stencil is also infringing on some obscure copyright holder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threadless and copyright infringement: a discussion :) - T-Shirt Forums</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>threadless and copyright infringement: a discussion :) - T-Shirt Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] threadless and copyright infringement: a discussion :)     I first read about this on PreShrunk.info: Threadless Deals With Plagiarism  Then I read about the &quot;resolution&quot; of it at threadless: Threadless T-Shirts - What exactly happened with Tagged?  Now, this of course not the first time threadless has had this type of issue before, but this one seemed to be relevant to some recent discussion on protecting your work, so I thought it would be interesting to discuss here.  How do you think threadless handled it?  Do you think it was copyright infringement?  Can we have a cool discussion about this without drama?     __________________ Rodney Blackwell T-Shirt Links Directory ~ T-Shirt Countdown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] threadless and copyright infringement: a discussion <img src='http://preshrunk.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />      I first read about this on PreShrunk.info: Threadless Deals With Plagiarism  Then I read about the &quot;resolution&quot; of it at threadless: Threadless T-Shirts &#8211; What exactly happened with Tagged?  Now, this of course not the first time threadless has had this type of issue before, but this one seemed to be relevant to some recent discussion on protecting your work, so I thought it would be interesting to discuss here.  How do you think threadless handled it?  Do you think it was copyright infringement?  Can we have a cool discussion about this without drama?     __________________ Rodney Blackwell T-Shirt Links Directory ~ T-Shirt Countdown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallabees</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallabees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-367</guid>
		<description>This is so naive. How can anyone think he can submit a design to threadless and it won&#039;t be spotted as stolen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so naive. How can anyone think he can submit a design to threadless and it won&#8217;t be spotted as stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I Oughtta &#187; Pants on fire!</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I Oughtta &#187; Pants on fire!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] Big scandal over at Threadless. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big scandal over at Threadless. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Threadless has also had another design that was basically taken from somewhere else-- the one design with the Beatles putting each other in make up. Also, I think the design with the devil and angel or whatever boxing was stolen. They were both taken from pretty ancient books, but it was cheaitng nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Threadless has also had another design that was basically taken from somewhere else&#8211; the one design with the Beatles putting each other in make up. Also, I think the design with the devil and angel or whatever boxing was stolen. They were both taken from pretty ancient books, but it was cheaitng nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-364</guid>
		<description>&quot;well, what’s done is done isn’t it? though it is the designers fault, he shouldn’t have copied, and he got $2000 dollars for copying. Great. Maybe I should go plagarise now. Wow. The hypocrisy in this world.&quot;

V, the &quot;designer&quot; did not receive any prize money for ripping off the design.  She formally apologized, and the prize was given to the original designers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;well, what’s done is done isn’t it? though it is the designers fault, he shouldn’t have copied, and he got $2000 dollars for copying. Great. Maybe I should go plagarise now. Wow. The hypocrisy in this world.&#8221;</p>
<p>V, the &#8220;designer&#8221; did not receive any prize money for ripping off the design.  She formally apologized, and the prize was given to the original designers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Outbreak Girl (http://www.threadless.com/product/73/Outbreak_Girl) was jacked from a non-licensed stock photo.  I think they ended up just buying the stock photo to deal with that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outbreak Girl (<a href="http://www.threadless.com/product/73/Outbreak_Girl" rel="nofollow">http://www.threadless.com/product/73/Outbreak_Girl</a>) was jacked from a non-licensed stock photo.  I think they ended up just buying the stock photo to deal with that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-362</guid>
		<description>well, what&#039;s done is done isn&#039;t it? though it is the designers fault, he shouldn&#039;t have copied, and he got $2000 dollars for copying. Great. Maybe I should go plagarise now. Wow. The hypocrisy in this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, what&#8217;s done is done isn&#8217;t it? though it is the designers fault, he shouldn&#8217;t have copied, and he got $2000 dollars for copying. Great. Maybe I should go plagarise now. Wow. The hypocrisy in this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Thanks for teh repost, boogah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for teh repost, boogah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Powers</title>
		<link>http://preshrunk.org/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preshrunk.info/2006/12/threadless-deals-with-plagiarism.php#comment-360</guid>
		<description>While this is certainly plagiarism, a moral no-no for artists, it is also copyright infringement and illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this is certainly plagiarism, a moral no-no for artists, it is also copyright infringement and illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

